Judge reinforces order barring immediate work on Trump arch in Washington

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

The US Interior Department has announced plans to move forward soon with work for the 76m arch near Arlington National Cemetery despite legal challenges.

The US Interior Department has announced plans to move forward soon with work for the 76m arch near Arlington National Cemetery despite legal challenges.

PHOTO: REUTERS

  • A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to give 48 hours’ notice before any work on the planned Trump arch near Arlington National Cemetery, except for archaeological testing.
  • The administration claims a 1925 law authorises the arch, but opponents argue it violates federal law and lacks Congressional approval.
  • The arch project faces legal and planning challenges, with concerns over historic site impact and ongoing court disputes delaying construction.

AI generated

WASHINGTON - A federal judge on Sept 4 ordered the Trump administration to give 48 hours’ notice before engaging in any activity on the site of a triumphal arch it wants to build near Arlington National Cemetery, except for work to identify underground cultural artifacts.

The ruling by US District Judge Tanya Chutkan came a day after the US Interior Department announced plans to move forward soon with work for the 76m arch despite legal challenges and the lack of final approval from a government planning authority.

In a US District Court filing on Sept 4 seeking a temporary restraining order, lawyers for a group of three military veterans and an architectural historian said the administration has “no legal basis for the construction work.”

They said the arch violates federal law and needs approval from Congress.

The administration has argued a 1925 law that authorised a now-defunct commission to build Washington’s Arlington Memorial Bridge provides congressional approval for the arch, which the opponents dispute.

Despite Sept 3’s announcement on X by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum of work starting after “a very long wait,” the government said in a court filing on Sept 4 the planned excavation work at the arch site was “not construction, or demolition in preparation for construction, of an arch.”

The government added in its court filing that it plans to dig four “test pits” to assess if any artifacts or cultural materials are present, starting on or after Sept 21. It said it would restore the site by Oct 31.

Chutkan in April sharply questioned Trump’s authority to build the arch and the government in April agreed to provide 14 days’ notice before starting construction.

The Interior Department reiterated that notice plan on Sept 4.

In her latest ruling, Chutkan ordered the administration to provide the court at least 48 hours’ notice before “engaging in any activity” at the site, except efforts to gather information on archaeological resources beneath subsurface fill materials as required under the National Historic Preservation Act.

She also reiterated that any construction or demolition in preparation for construction before the National Park Service issues a final authorisation, or without providing 14 days’ notice, would violate Sept 4’s order and her previous consent order.

The arch is part of Trump’s broader effort to leave his architectural mark on America’s capital city, with projects including a new White House ballroom, renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and redevelopment of a golf course in East Potomac Park.

With a design evoking Paris’ Arc de Triomphe, the monument would rise near the Arlington National Cemetery, a military burial ground, which supporters say would honour the sacrifice of American veterans.

Opponents say the arch would destroy the cemetery’s carefully designed historic sight line between Lincoln Memorial and Arlington House.

The project also has yet to receive final approval from the National Capital Planning Commission, which is considering whether to grant an exception to the 40m building height limit that applies to most of Washington.

In the Sept 4 court filing, opponents of the project pointed to Trump’s construction of a ballroom on the White House grounds as a “cautionary tale,” saying the government proceeded with construction even though a District Court found it unlawful and the Circuit Court affirmed the ruling.

The US Supreme Court last week in a 5-4 ruling let ballroom construction continue while Trump challenges a judicial ​order that would halt much of the development, with Chief Justice John Roberts in a dissent calling the project “likely unlawful.” REUTERS

See more on