US military strikes oil tankers as Iran vows tougher reprisals
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
A screengrab from footage provided by US Central Command on Sept 5 showing strikes that destroyed three oil tankers linked to Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, after the Iranian military fired on American warships.
PHOTO: AFP
- The US destroyed three Iranian oil tankers linked to the IRGC after Iran attempted missile attacks on American naval vessels.
- Iran warned of tougher reprisals if US strikes continue, while the US aims to isolate Iran economically through sanctions.
- The conflict centres on control of the Strait of Hormuz, with both sides escalating military and economic pressure amid US political concerns.
AI generated
WASHINGTON – The United States said it destroyed three Iranian oil tankers on Sept 5 in response to attempted missile attacks on naval vessels, prompting Iran’s military to warn of tougher reprisals if the strikes continued.
The latest round of clashes, which began with US raids last week, comes with both sides deadlocked in the six-month war as Tehran maintains its stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz and Washington presses its counter-blockade of Iranian ports.
In addition to the renewed military action, Washington is seeking to choke Iran’s economy, announcing sanctions on entities with financial links to the Islamic republic in a bid to further isolate it and force it into submission.
US Central Command (CENTCOM) said it targeted tankers linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), accusing the most powerful arm of the Iranian military of unsuccessfully firing at American warships.
“Following Iran’s failed attacks, CENTCOM permanently disabled the IRGC crude oil carriers M/T Downy off the coast of Kharg Island and M/T Stark 1 near Jask,” it said in a statement.
“American forces also completely destroyed the unladen crude oil carrier M/T Kylo... in the Gulf of Oman, striking the vessel in multiple critical locations to render it inoperable after the crew was directed to abandon ship.”
A video posted by CENTCOM showed large fireballs and billowing flames after projectiles slammed into the ships.
The three vessels were “part of a multibillion-dollar shadow network that funds the IRGC and its regional proxies”, it said.
After the strikes, CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper said: “If you shoot at two of our ships, we will impose an even higher economic cost – taking out three of yours.”
But Iran appeared undeterred, with the IRGC announcing later on Sept 5 that its naval forces had subsequently “targeted three oil tankers on the unauthorised route of the Strait of Hormuz and three vessels affiliated with the child-killing America in other areas”.
It warned other ships not to attempt to transit by unapproved routes.
CENTCOM did not immediately respond to AFP’s questions about the IRGC claims. There were no immediate reports from British maritime security service UKMTO’s civilian tankers being targeted in the strait.
The Iranian Foreign Ministry earlier hit out at Washington over the strikes on the oil tankers, calling them “illegal and aggressive actions”.
A correspondent for Iranian state TV in Jask, in the southern province of Hormozgan, said one of the tankers was empty and the second was carrying oil. The crews were transported to shore on lifeboats.
Another state TV correspondent on Kharg Island said the attack there caused no casualties.
Iran’s Khatam-al Anbiya central military command warned that if the US continued its attacks, then Iranian retaliation against US warships would be “more severe than before and there is a possibility of... expansion”.
‘Small potatoes’
The Trump administration has been seeking to play down the significance of the six-month conflict, which has proven increasingly unpopular at home as midterm elections near.
US Vice-President J.D. Vance went so far as to say that he “wouldn’t call it a war”, claiming that “right now, there is no active shooting” despite the ongoing exchanges of fire.
US President Donald Trump backed his comments on Sept 4, calling the Iran war “small potatoes” for the US and insisting “it’s not a big thing”.
Iran’s security chief Mohsen Rezaei warned this week that the Islamic republic had adopted a “new strategy” against Washington in the war that would “shatter your foundations”.
The US has been trying to step up pressure on Tehran over its blockade of the Hormuz Strait, through which one-fifth of the world’s oil supplies previously flowed.
A fragile ceasefire collapsed in July after attacks on commercial ships in the strategic waterway.
Trump has in recent weeks repeatedly threatened to claim sovereignty over the strait, even posting a map showing it as a “new US territory”.
Vance has also insisted that the US will not reopen talks with Iran until it ends attacks on commercial shipping in the Hormuz.
But with fuel prices threatening to cost Trump’s Republicans their control of Congress at the ballot box, his administration has begun pushing the message that oil flows through the waterway are now returning to pre-war levels.
“Their control over the Strait of Hormuz is effectively gone,” Vance said of Iran on Sept 3.
Before the latest hostilities erupted, the US had appeared to be pivoting to economic warfare rather than military operations.
On Sept 4, the US Treasury announced sanctions on a Turkish bank over its alleged ties to the IRGC, and last week, Washington took a step towards cutting off a major Egyptian bank’s operations in the United Arab Emirates from the US financial system.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has laid out plans for the “economic asphyxiation” of Iran, warning of dire consequences for countries that do not join the American pressure campaign. AFP
