US Fed’s Kevin Warsh surprised by world economy’s ‘resilience’
Sign up now: Get insights on Asia's fast-moving developments
US Federal Reserve chairman Kevin Warsh was speaking at an event at the IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings in Bangkok on Oct 16.
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
- Warsh said the global economy has shown “resilience” despite shocks, higher energy costs and inflation, as central banks, including the Fed, keep tightening policy.
- He said rich countries face the same inflation fight and praised the “synchronous tightening” by central banks as a positive step with no “free riders”.
- Warsh called AI the “most consequential change” to the global economy, saying it may lift inflation short term but bring long-term benefits, though the path will be “bumpy”.
AI generated
BANGKOK – US Federal Reserve boss Kevin Warsh said on Oct 16 the global economy had shown unexpected resilience against strong economic shocks, as central banks battle surging inflation, while rich countries tackle spiking bond yields.
“Almost everywhere in the global economy (is) showing resilience I’m not sure I would have predicted five or six months ago,” he told an event hosted by International Monetary Fund (IMF) chief Kristalina Georgieva at the IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings in Bangkok.
World energy prices have skyrocketed since US President Donald Trump launched the war on Iran in February, sparking retaliatory action by Tehran against Washington’s Gulf allies and plunging the Middle East into crisis.
The increase in oil and gas costs, along with a surge in AI investments, has spurred inflation in many economies, including the United States, putting pressure on central banks to raise interest rates.
While many other rich economies were able to bring post-pandemic inflation back to their targets, the Fed has failed to meet its long-term 2% goal for more than five years.
Since taking over as Fed chair in May, Warsh has promised the central bank will deliver on its price stability commitment, and in September, it raised rates for the first time in three years.
The Fed meets again in October to set rates, and markets expect it to hold before a second 25-basis-point hike in December.
Warsh has vowed to cut down on providing insights into Fed policy positions, and on Oct 16 again refrained from sharing his view of what may transpire at the October gathering.
“We came to a judgment” about the economic outlook at the September meeting, he said.
“I want to say broadly over the month or so that’s transpired since then, the world has broadly conformed to our expectations.”
‘Bumpy road’ on AI
The annual meetings bring together finance ministers, central bankers and policymakers from around the world, and Warsh said he had heard from others of the “common challenges” advanced economies faced.
“I heard, I would say, resolve from my colleagues around the world to deliver price stability,” he said.
Most rich nations have begun to raise rates in response to surging inflation, including the European Central Bank.
“If I look back over the last few months, while we each did the right thing by our own judgment, by our own remit, it was a synchronous tightening in monetary policy in most places around the world,” said Warsh.
“And that means there’s no free-riders. We’re seeing common things, and we’re taking action, and I view that as a positive development.”
A large part of the discussion on Oct 16 centred on artificial intelligence, and Warsh said he believed the technology was the “most consequential change” to the global economy he had seen, predicting its effects would be positive but the path forward “bumpy”.
He said he takes the macroeconomic implications of the technology – including a short-term driving of inflation through demand-side effects and an expected positive supply-side shock in the long term – “soberly” in his role as Fed chief.
While he conceded the AI investment boom would drive prices up in the short term, he felt there was a “huge benefit” to the global economy on the horizon.
He cautioned, however, that the path forward was still laced with uncertainty about how markets would evolve around the technology.
“The path from where we are to there is likely to be a very bumpy one, bumpy in our understanding of the technology, bumpy because we really don’t know what the market structure is going to be of these new technologies,” he said. AFP
