SINGAPORE - Manpower Minister Josephine Teo explained on Monday (Feb 18) in Parliament why she is wary of making a sudden change in the policy on the age that Central Provident Fund members can automatically receive monthly payouts from their retirement account.

This is partly because members have been told for years that payouts start when they instruct the CPF Board. "So this has been the longstanding instruction," she said.

"Every time there is a change, it takes a long while for people to get used to it."

She suggests instead focusing on improving the communication for the policy as it stands.

"If we keep to this consistent line, there is less risk of further confusing (people)," she added in her reply to Mr Lim Biow Chuan (Mountbatten) and Mr Png Eng Huat (Hougang).

She also said that from this year, all members reaching their eligibility payout age can attend a CPF Retirement Planning Service, a face-to-face personal service.

Mr Lim had expressed concern that the number of members who did not activate their payouts by 70 is not small, and asked if the payouts could start automatically at 65.

Mrs Teo replied she had given serious thought to it but said, among other things, that the board cannot do this and deprive members of the benefits of keeping their money in CPF.

She conceded that the CPF Board could do a better job of keeping members up to speed on policy issues. "There is much room for improvement in the way (the Board) communicates key issues like starting payouts".

She was referring to the recent confusion of some CPF members over what age they can start receiving monthly payouts.

Social media posts of a CPF letter that advised the recipient about his CPF payout options on turning 65 led some people to mistakenly conclude the payout age had been raised to 70.

Others thought that if they did not apply to start receiving payouts at age 65, the next time they could do so would be at 70 years old.

It led to at least nine MPs asking for, among other things, to allow members to automatically receive their payouts at age 65.

Mrs Teo, in her reply, stressed there will be no change in the policy: CPF members can continue to choose to start monthly payouts at 65 or defer them to anytime between 65 and 70.

She assured the House the CPF Board will take steps to improve communication, including reviewing letters sent to those nearing their payout eligibility age to avoid the kind of misunderstandings that sparked the recent confusion.

She also, in her reply to Mr Liang Eng Hwa (Holland-Bukit Timah GRC), encouraged members to visit CPF service centres across the island to get customised guidance.

Her ministry, which oversees the CPF Board, will also work with other agencies such as the Social Service Offices and Silver Generation Office.

Mrs Teo said there was no advantage for the CPF Board or Government to want members to defer payouts beyond 65. In fact, members enjoy "tangible benefits" when payouts start later like higher interest.

She noted that for each year payouts are deferred, a member's CPF savings will earn risk-free interest of up to 6 per cent, well above market rates.

So members tend to defer, especially if they have other savings to draw on that are earning low interest or if they are still working.

Mrs Teo said that in the past, some Retirement Sum Scheme (RSS) members had their savings in their CPF accounts until they died, which "is unsatisfactory".

That led to a new rule last year stipulating payouts cannot be deferred past 70, for members turning 70 from 2018.

She said about 60 per cent of RSS members who had reached their eligibility age in 2017 did not activate their payouts. Even when they reached 70, about half did not ask to start their payouts.

Mrs Teo said some of them may be keeping their savings in CPF because they had no need for the money or want to earn a higher interest. Others, however, may not know they could start their payouts earlier and so did not instruct CPF Board.